From Property Management to Property Services: A Study of the Driving Mechanism and Practical Pathways for the Transformation and Development of China's Property Industry

Authors

  • Feixiao Zhang School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan, 454000, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62051/ajmse.v1n5.03

Keywords:

Property Management Services, Industry Transformation, Community Governance, Digital Property Management, Service Quality

Abstract

As China's real estate market gradually transitions from the phase of incremental development to the phase of existing stock operation, the development logic of the property management industry is undergoing profound transformations. The traditional property management model primarily focused on facility maintenance, order management, and basic support services; it played a pivotal role during the period of rapid real estate development. However, with residents' growing demands for community quality, living services, and governance participation, the traditional model has begun to face challenges in areas such as service supply, corporate operations, and governance synergy. Promoting a shift in the property management industry from a "management-oriented" approach to a "service-oriented" one has become a critical direction for the high-quality development of the sector. This paper employs a combined approach of literature review and case study, selecting three typical cases—Lize in Beijing, Xietang in Suzhou, and the Yantai High-tech Zone—to analyze the driving mechanisms and practical pathways for the transformation and development of the property management industry from perspectives such as service models, governance mechanisms, and operational methods. The study reveals that the entry of the real estate market into the existing stock phase, the policy environment's impetus, the empowerment provided by digital technologies, and the rising demand for grassroots governance have collectively driven the transformation and upgrading of the property management industry; current new models of property services are characterized mainly by diversified governance entities, enhanced quality of service content, digitalized operational methods, and community-centric service boundaries. Nevertheless, the transformation of the property management industry still faces challenges such as an incomplete regulatory framework, insufficient comprehensive service capabilities of enterprises, and an underdeveloped service evaluation mechanism. In the future, measures such as refining policy systems, enhancing corporate capabilities, and optimizing the service evaluation system should be implemented to facilitate the high-quality development of the property management industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Guo, Y., & Zhang, J. (2026, March 16). National People's Congress Representative Fan Yun: Property companies should not be "managers" but should have service awareness. China Business News, p. B06.

[2] Lian, C., & Zhai, P. Path optimization for the diversified resolution of property disputes empowered by digital technology. Journal of Hunan Police Academy, 1–9. [Manuscript submitted for publication].

[3] Meng, Q. (2025). On the economic relevance between service quality and charging mechanism in residential property management. Housing and Real Estate, (31), 66–68.

[4] Qiu, H. (2016). Reflection and exploration on China's property management model. Knowledge Economy, (9), 57–58.

[5] Wei, Y. (2024). Analysis of the transformation from traditional property management to modern property services. Zhangjiang Science and Technology Review, (5), 25–27.

[6] Chen, X., & Li, X. (2025). From disorder to co governance: The practical logic of embedded governance of entrusted property management in old residential communities. Journal of Guiyang Municipal Party School, (5), 40–47.

[7] Han, B. (2026). From "building houses" to "governing communities": Breakthrough and reconstruction in the deep waters of urban governance in 2025 -- An annual observation based on the Central Urban Work Conference and the new landscape of national property governance. Housing and Real Estate, (7), 12–14.

[8] Zeng, B., Li, S., Sun, X., et al. (2023). Research and innovative application of digital virtual property-- Taking digital property management in Tongzhou District, Beijing as an example. China Construction Informatization, (16), 55–59.

[9] Yang, Y. (2024). Analysis of the path to high quality development of property management in the new era. Housing and Real Estate, (19), 56–58.

[10] Wang, S. (2025). Objectives, principles, positioning and ideas for the revision of the "Property Management Regulations". Housing and Real Estate, (34), 32–35.

[11] Li, G. (2024). Discussion on institutional dilemmas and reform paths of property management (VI): Countermeasures and suggestions for property management reform. Housing and Real Estate, (34), 37–40.

[12] Qian, X., Huang, L., Bao, Y., et al. (2016). Upgrading from qualitative to quantitative management: A study on the service quality evaluation system for property management projects. Modern Property Management (Mid month), (4), 100–103.

Downloads

Published

17-08-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, F. (2026). From Property Management to Property Services: A Study of the Driving Mechanism and Practical Pathways for the Transformation and Development of China’s Property Industry. Academic Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 1(5), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.62051/ajmse.v1n5.03